Tuesday, November 09, 2004

10:10

I thought 10 after 10 was the best time for se.... ahh. you get the idea =) but it didn't even make into the article!

5 comments:

forkev said...

soo ... where do get your assumptions from? IF it's not in the article, find one where it is in an article!

k2h said...

I was unable to add sex to my google search at work, so that was the best article I could find!

k2h said...

doing some more googling....
its not on this survey
http://www.ivillage.co.uk/relationships/sex/talksex/articles/0,,173_603793,00.html

yup.. I can't find it anywhere.. must have been a figment of my imagination....

k2h said...

check out how the URL in the above post is wider than the column! I love how web browsers render stuff.

forkev said...

i wrote an algorithm that intillegencly split long strings like that for myweb page. the questions is, is it worth it?
no. if you don't like how it looks, change your font size on your comptuer or run with open source and change how the css is intrepreted.
I beleive the power of html/css is not in it's finaly quality, but in it's simplicity. if you want 'everything' use cutepdf with ghostscript to cram the web full of pdf's. otherwise, turn a blind eye. that's my attitude.